JACKSON v. CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
| MARVIN JOVAN JACKSON |
| DONALD DACUS, ROBERT SAMBROAK, JR., ERNEST J. DISANTIS, JR., JOHN A. BOZZA, THOMAS CARNEY, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHEAL NOLAN, GENE P. PLACIDI, ESQ. and UNIDENTIFIED RESPONDENT |
| 1:2014cv00003 |
| January 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Erie |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER indicating that that Plaintiff's "Objection to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" are overruled and the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 2 as the Opinion of the Court; that Pla intiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 1 is granted and the Clerk of Court is directed to file the Complaint of record; that Plaintiff's pro se Complaint is dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to the screening provisions of the Pri son Litigation Reform Act; that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 2/24/14. (jg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
