Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SANDERS v. DACUS
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
ORGUNA SANDERS and ORGUNA LADANIEL SANDERS
Defendant:
DET/SGT DONALD DACUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AKINS v. CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2018cv00395
Defendant:
CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT, DONALD DACUS and OFFICER TIMMOTHY SWEENEY
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS A. AKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NOBLE v. THE CITY OF ERIE, PA et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EARL NOBLE
Defendant:
THE CITY OF ERIE, PA, DONALD DACUS, MICHAEL NOLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2014cv00003
Plaintiff:
MARVIN JOVAN JACKSON
Defendant:
CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT, THOMAS CARNEY, JOHN A. BOZZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES et al v. CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2013cv00111
Plaintiff:
WILLIS B. BARNES and PATRICIA A. MOFFETT
Defendant:
CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT, DONALD DACUS, JOHN DOES 1-V and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VEROSKO v. NOLAN et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
DANIEL VEROSKO
Defendant:
MICHAEL NOLAN, DONALD DACUS, MATT BANACCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.