JAMES v. SAUERS et al
| PARIS L. JAMES |
| DEBRA SAUERS, ERIC TICE, MICHAEL OVERMYER, WANYE COLE, ANDRE REPCO, PAUL ENNIS, KIM SMITH, BRUCE SIMONS, JEFFERY MOLL, E. APADAC, MURN, RHONDA SHERBINE, EDWARD HEBERLING, ANGELO PERILLO, MICHELLE CROWDER, MCGARVIE, NURSE JANE DOE, WILSON, HOLLIS, GADLEY, ASP, FILTENBURGER, GRIFFIN, JOHN DOE (1.) and JOHN DOE (2.) |
| 1:2014cv00069 |
| March 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Forest |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
266
MEMORANDUM ORDER; this 14th day of July 2022; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion [ECF No. 256] is denied in all respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to appoint counsel [ECF No. 264] and Plaintiffs motion for writ of mandamus/preliminary injunction [ECF No. 265] are DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 07/14/22. (snc)
|
|
Filing
237
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re 230 MOTION for Default Judgment against E. APADAC, ASP, WANYE COLE, MICHELLE CROWDER, PAUL ENNIS, FILTENBURGER, GADLEY, EDWARD HEBERLING, HOLLIS, MCGARIVE, MURN, MICHAEL OVERMYER, ANGELO PERILLO, JEAN PUHL, ANDRE REP CO, DEBRA SAUERS, RHONDA SHERBINE, BRUC filed by PARIS L. JAMES. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment is granted in favor of Plaintiff Paris James and against Defendant Angelo Perillo, in the amount of $6584.00. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 10/16/19. (esa)
|
|
Filing
215
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting 194 MOTION for Default Judgment against ANGELO PERILLO filed by PARIS L. JAMES. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 10/5/2018. (css)
|
|
Filing
202
ORDER ENTERED directing that pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(1) and the court order of 3/24/1999 at Misc. 99-95, the Clerk of Court is directed to request a lawyer to consider entering an appearance on behalf of the plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that t he Clerk of Court is directed to provide counsel with any additional pleadings or documents as requested by counsel; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is hereby administratively closed pending appointment of counsel, at which point the case will be reopened. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 5/7/18. (rdl)
|
|
Filing
187
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations 181 . The Commonwealth Defendants summary judgment motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs retaliation and Eight Amendment claim based on the revocation of Plaintiffs Z-code status, and DENIED as to Plaintiffs excessive force and Eight Amendment claim based on delay of medical treatment. Signed by Judge Barbara Rothstein on 3/5/18. (hr)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 97 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; adopting Report and Recommendations re 107 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Barbara Rothstein on 12/9/2016. (nk)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting 64 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 03/25/15. (mcp)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying as moot the 14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim in light of the filing of the Amended Complaint; granting in part and denying in part the 30 Renewed Motion to Dismiss, as set forth therein; and adopting the 44 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 01/28/15. (mcp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
