Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Sauer v. Life Storage
as 1:2023cv15645
Plaintiff:
Debra Sauer
Defendant:
Life Storage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sauer v. Herminstyne et al
as 1:2021cv06555
Plaintiff:
Debra Sauer
Defendant:
Bianka Herminstyne and Chicago Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sauer v. Herminstyne et al
as 1:2021cv04582
Plaintiff:
Debra Sauer
Defendant:
Bianka Herminstyne and Chicago Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Debra Sauer v. City of Chicago, et al
as 21-2433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBRA SAUER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, OLIVIA STOVALL, Chicago Police Officer, SCOTT ROGUS, Chicago Police Officer and others
Debra Sauer v. City of Chicago, et al
as 21-1924
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, MAXIM CHASANOV, RONALD GORDINEER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBRA SAUER
In re: Kai Ingram
as 17-1058
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant - Respondent:
DEBRA SAUERS, JACQUELINE M. CARROLL, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JOHN E JONES, III
In re: Kai Ingram
as 16-4188
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant - Respondent:
DEBRA SAUERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and STEFANIE J. SALAVANTIS
Nominal Respondent:
JOHN E JONES, III
Sauer v. Methodist Hospital of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv07191
Plaintiff:
Debra Sauer
Defendant:
Methodist Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, City Of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JAMES v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS, ERIC TICE, MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
JAMES OSCAR WRIGHT
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS, MICHEAL OVERMYER, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
