WILLIAMS v. CLARK et al
| SHAWN L. WILLIAMS |
| MICHAEL R. CLARK, NANCY A. GIROUX, MELINDA L. ADAMS, CARL FRANZ, CHRISTOPHER M. MEURE, RYAN SZELEWSKI, EARL J. JONES, T. IRWIN, T. ANDERSON, TAMMY BASHOR, HARMON, BEDDICK, HAMMETT, VILLEGAS, NICOLE KNIGHT, JERI SMOCK, MICHAEL EDWARDS, LISA LINDER-GUNTHER, DANIEL C. STROUP, ALEXIS SECARA and CINDY CHUZIE |
| 1:2017cv00204 |
| July 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Erie |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 93 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by T. IRWIN, T. ANDERSON, RYAN SZELEWSKI, TAMMY BASHOR, CHRISTOPHER M. MEURE, EARL J. JONES, BEDDICK, CARL FRANZ, VALERIE KUSIAK, MICHAEL R. CLARK, NANCY A. GIROUX. Defendants 9; motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 93) is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is denied as to Williams' retaliation claim against Defendant Beddick for the allegedly retaliatory October 31 misconduct charge. It is granted as to all other claims against all other Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 1/7/2020. (dm)
|
|
Filing
108
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re 89 MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by SHAWN L. WILLIAMS. The motion will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion to compel is DENIED as to Requests No. 4 and 5. The motion to compel the production of the housing unit log entries is DENIED. As to Request No. 13, Defendants already have complied with the request and the motion as it relates to this request is DENIED AS MOOT. To the extent an updated version of the procedures was in effect in 2015, and notwithstanding its potential availability through other means, the motion to compel is GRANTED as to this request, and Defendants are ordered to produce the updated version to Williams within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. The motion to compel as to Request Nos. 6 & 9 is DENIED as to this request with the understanding that the Court retains the authority to take proper action if it is later determined that any party has wrongfully withheld responsive documents or provided untru thful or misleading responses to discovery. Williams' motion to compel is DENIED as to interrogatory No. 3. Plaintiff's motion to compel answers to Interrogatories 5, 7, 8, 9 and 11 is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion to compel answers to I nterrogatories 1,9,11 & 12 is DENIED AS MOOT as to this request with the understanding that the Court retains the authority to take proper action if it is later determined that any party has wrongfully withheld responsive information or provided untr uthful or misleading responses to discovery. The Court will DENY the motion as to Interrogatory 2 and 12. The motion to compel is DENIED as to Interrogatory 10. The motion to compel as to Request Nos. 4 & 6 is DENIED. The Court will DENY Williams' motion to compel the production of the DOC policies 6.3.1. The motion to compel is DENIED as to request No. 11 and Request Nos. 16-22 are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 7/12/2019. (dm)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER denying 77 MOTION for the Court to take Judicial Notice for Need of Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Court to take Judicial notice for Need of Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on January 10, 2019. (jbh)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER: Upon consideration of Defendants' 53 Motion to Sever, and the Plaintiff's 57 Response thereto, the Motion is GRANTED as follows:1. The Clerk is hereby instructed to TERMINATE the following misjoined Defendants from this action: C.O. Villegas, P.S.S. Knight. 2. Should the Plaintiff wish to proceed with any separate lawsuits against misjoined Defendants Villegas and Knight, he may do so by initiating separate actions in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3 . The Complaint, filed at Case No. 1 :17-cv-204, shall proceed against Defendant Beddick and Supervisory Defendants Giroux, Clark, Franz, Meure, Irwin, Jones, Anders, Bashor, Szelewski, and Kusiak. 4. The claims stated in this Complaint against Defen dants Hammett and Harmon at ECF No. 4 are hereby SEVERED. The Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of this order to refile these claims as separate actions. 5. The Defendants remaining at Case No. 1: 17-cv-204 shall file an answer, motion to dismiss, and/or any other relevant pleadings on or before Friday, November 30, 2018. 6. Williams' Motion for Clarification docketed at ECF No. 62 is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 11/14/2018. (dm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
