Cases 1 - 10 of 34
LEWALD v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv04625
Plaintiff:
TROY LEWALD
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WELLPATH HOLDINGS LLC, KIP HALLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCARY v. CLARK
as 2:2021cv00340
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LA SHAWN MCCARY
Respondent:
CCPM MICHAEL R. CLARK
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schifanelli v. Queen Anne's County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2020cv02906
Defendant:
Matthew Evans, Queen Anne's County, Michael R Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Gordana Schifanelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. Hiltz
as 20-1856
Interested Party:
FRANCESCA BOWMAN, MICHAEL MAHONEY, JEFFREY LONDRES and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LAWRENCE B. HILTZ
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
FERGUSON v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv02858
Petitioner:
WILLIAM FERGUSON
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and MICHAEL R. CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLLINS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2019cv00348
Defendant:
C.O. RUF, SERGEANT SEVERO and WARDEN MICHAEL R. CLARK
Plaintiff:
TERRY COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sauers v. Clark et al
as 1:2019cv01794
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Michael R. Clark and E. David Christine, Jr.
Petitioner:
Nathan Robert Sauers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. CLARK et al
as 1:2019cv00199
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL R. CLARK, ERIE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
DAVON DEANDRE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCOTT v. CLARK et al
as 1:2019cv00169
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D. SCOTT
Defendant:
G. McINTOSH, CCPM MICHAEL R. CLARK and OFFICER S. ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
