HORSH v. CLARK et al
| CHARLES KEITH HORSH |
| MICHAEL CLARK, MELINDA ADAMS, JERI SMOCK, MICHAEL BOGGIO, REHKA HALLIGAN, DANIEL STROUP, ALEXIS SECARA, MICHAEL EDWARDS and CYNTHIA CHUZIE |
| 1:2017cv00316 |
| November 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Adams |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
152
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 135 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ALEXIS SECARA, DANIEL STROUP, MICHAEL BOGGIO, CYNTHIA CHUZIE, REHKA HALLIGAN, 131 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by JERI SMOCK, MICHAEL EDWARDS. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 9/29/2021. (esa)
|
|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 82 MOTION to Amend/Correct 57 Amended Complaint 58 Errata, filed by CHARLES KEITH HORSH, 79 Rule 58 Judgment and 80 MOTION to Alter Judgment filed by CHARLES KEITH HORSH. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 03/17/2020. (esa)
|
|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 66 MOTION for the determination of a certificate of merit as unnecessary filed by CHARLES KEITH HORSH, 63 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by JERI SMOCK, MELINDA ADAMS, MICHAEL EDWARDS, MICHAEL CLARK, 61 MOTION to Dismiss re 57 Amended Complaint, filed by ALEXIS SECARA, DANIEL STROUP, CYNTHIA CHUZIE, REHKA HALLIGAN. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 3/18/19. (lrw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
