SCHMUTTE v. HUTCHINSON
Petitioner: SHANE M. SCHMUTTE
Respondent: WARDEN HUTCHINSON, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 1:2022cv00069
Filed: February 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Richard A Lanzillo
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by SHANE M. SCHMUTTE. HUTCHINSON served on 3/22/2022, answer due 4/12/2022; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA served on 3/22/2022, answer due 05/21/2022; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL served on 3/29/2022, answer due 4/19/2022. (jd)
March 23, 2022 Filing 7 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by HUTCHINSON, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL. (Wilk, Ryan)
March 23, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan Wilk on behalf of HUTCHINSON, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL. (Wilk, Ryan)
March 18, 2022 Filing 5 RECEIPT from Schmutte for Habeas Filing Fee received on 3/18/2022 (elt) Modified text on 3/21/2022, Receipt number 14668005130. (jd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/21/2022: #1 Receipt) (elt).
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the petition, upon the respondents by certified mail, costs to be advanced by the United States. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 3/9/2022. (dm)
February 23, 2022 Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 14668005130), filed by SHANE M. SCHMUTTE. (jd)
February 22, 2022 Filing 1 Remark: Habeas Petition lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SCHMUTTE v. HUTCHINSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SHANE M. SCHMUTTE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN HUTCHINSON
Represented By: Ryan Wilk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Ryan Wilk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: Ryan Wilk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?