SPUCK v. SALYNSKI, ESQUIRE
| DANIEL L. SPUCK |
| MARY KATHRYN SALYNSKI, ESQ. and MARY KATHRYN SALYNSKI, ESQUIRE |
| 1:2022cv00344 |
| November 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cathy Bissoon |
| Maureen P Kelly |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
JUDGMENT ORDER. FINAL JUDGMENT hereby is entered pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case has been marked closed. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/28/22. (dcd) Staff note: a copy of this filing will be sent, via First-Class U.S. Mail, to Plaintiff's address of record.
|
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM ORDER. This case is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff's filing a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court, if and as appropriate. The R&R (Doc. #7 ) is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/28/22. (dcd) Staff note: a copy of this filing will be sent, via First-Class U.S. Mail, to Plaintiff's address of record.
|
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT by DANIEL L. SPUCK to #6 Objections to Report and Recommendation. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Exhibit) (kss) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: it has come to the Court's attention that a page of the #5 Report and Recommendation dated November 22, 2022 is missing from the docket. Therefore, a copy of the full text of the #5 Report and Recommendation, which is attached hereto, will be mailed to Plaintiff at his address of record. This is the complete text of the #5 Report and Recommendation, and not an amended or supplemental document. The deadline for Plaintiff to submit supplemental objections is 12/20/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 12/2/2022. (dad)
|
| Filing 6 OBJECTIONS to #5 Report and Recommendation filed by DANIEL L. SPUCK. (kss) |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #3 Complaint filed by DANIEL L. SPUCK. It is respectfully recommended that this case be dismissed sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Objections to R&R due by 12/6/2022; Objections to R&R for Unregistered ECF Users due by 12/9/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 11/21/2022. (et) |
| Judge Cathy Bissoon added as presider (Related to 2:14-cv-5). (jv) |
| Judge Cercone Terminated as Presider (jv) |
| Judge David S. Cercone added as presider and Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly added as referred. (jv) |
| Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly no longer assigned to case as presider. (jv) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT by DANIEL L. SPUCK to #3 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kss) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against MARY KATHRYN SALYNSKI, ESQUIRE, filed by DANIEL L. SPUCK. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (kss) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to file the Notice as a civil rights complaint. As more fully stated herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 11/15/2022. A copy of this Order was mailed to Plaintiff at his address of record. (dad)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DANIEL L. SPUCK. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Exhibit) (kss) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
