Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Daniel Spuck v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 23-1193
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL L. SPUCK
Defendant / Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JANE/JOHN DOE, LEADER/HEAD OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Daniel Spuck v. Mary Salynski
as 23-1197
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL L. SPUCK
Defendant / Appellee: MARY KATHRYN SALYNSKI
SPUCK v. SALYNSKI, ESQUIRE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00344
Plaintiff: DANIEL L. SPUCK
Defendant: MARY KATHRYN SALYNSKI, ESQ. and MARY KATHRYN SALYNSKI, ESQUIRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SPUCK v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00341
Plaintiff: DANIEL L. SPUCK
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
SPUCK v. CLEARFIELD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 3:2017cv00002
Petitioner: DANIEL L. SPUCK
Respondent: CLEARFIELD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and BRIAN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPUCK v. THOMPSON
as 3:2016cv00172
Petitioner: DANIEL L. SPUCK
Respondent: BRIAN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPUCK v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 3:2016cv00101
Petitioner: DANIEL L. SPUCK
Respondent: PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00630
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SPUCK v. THOMPSON et al
as 3:2015cv00129
Petitioner: DANIEL L. SPUCK
Respondent: BRIAN THOMPSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPUCK v. THOMPSON et al
as 3:2015cv00112
Petitioner: DANIEL L. SPUCK
Respondent: BRIAN THOMPSON and PAUL STOWITSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?