STRATTON v. STEVE et al
ROBERT STRATTON |
STEVE, BRIAN COLEMAN, BARRIA, PETE SAAVADRE, DR. GALLUCCI, SUE BARRIER, MAYERS, SHELLY MANKEY, LIESURE, KERRI CROSS and COLLINS |
2:2011cv00142 |
February 3, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Fayette |
Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 167 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 164 USCA Order, in accordance with the Order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, this Court finds that Plaintiff has shown grounds for relief within the meaning of Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 8/31/2015. A copy of this Memorandum Order is being mailed to Plaintiff at SCI-Huntingdon via First Class mail which is where the DOC Inmate Locator shows him to be presently confined. (tmr) |
Filing 142 ORDER granting 125 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 1/28/2014. (ndf ) |
Filing 80 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 77 of Magistrate Judge Kelly; that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 50 is denied; that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the defendants desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 5/18/12. (jg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.