Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Shavez HoldenIn re: Shavez Holden
as 19-2687
Not Yet Classified:
SGT. KOPCHICK, C.O. 2, S.C.I. Forest, In re: SHAWVEZ NELSON A/K/A SHAVEZ HOLDEN, ZACHARY J. MOSLAK, Chief Hearing Examiner and others
HOLDEN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00237
Defendant:
SGT. KOPCHICK, CAPTAIN CARTER, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
SHAVEZ HOLDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WOODS v. MALANOSKI et al
as 2:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
JEROME CARLTON WOODS
Defendant:
MAUREEN MALANOSKI, CANDICE LACKEY, DAVID E. ZETWO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurman Mearin v. Louis Folino, et al
as 16-1721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THURMAN MEARIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, Superintendent, CARLA SWARTZ, Program Review Committee, GREG JOHNSON, Program Review Committee and others
KEELS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv00302
Plaintiff:
DESMOND KEELS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JAY LANE, STEVE BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dwayne Rieco v. Brian Coleman, et al
as 15-2564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN COLEMAN, DOCTOR SAVAADRE, DOCTOR GALLUCCI and others
GREEN v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
MUWSA GREEN
Defendant:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN, DEBRA A. HAWKINBERRY, LT. HAWKINBERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MEARIN v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2014cv01717
Plaintiff:
THURMAN MEARIN
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, CARLA SWARTZ, ROBERT DIETZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. CRAYTON et al
as 2:2012cv01533
Plaintiff:
EDWARD F JENKINS
Defendant:
CRAYTON, ROLL, WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Crayton et al
as 3:2012cv02006
Plaintiff:
Edward F Jenkins
Defendant:
Crayton, Roll, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
