WOODS v. MALANOSKI et al
| JEROME CARLTON WOODS |
| MAUREEN MALANOSKI, CANDICE LACKEY, DAVID E. ZETWO, SHTCHESMER, A. ROSEBOSKY, BELL, SCHAUP, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, BRENDA RINCKE, CHAD L. ALLENSWORTH, RENE ADAMS, CAROL A. SCIRE, KERRI CROSS, SYBLIK, MULLOLY, MACAUGHAG, TKOCS and VERMUELEN |
| 2:2017cv00017 |
| January 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Greene |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting as modified 50 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 8/21/2018. (eet)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 23 Defendants' Motion for More Definite Statement. Plaintiff shall amend his complaint as described herein and file it with the Court within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff shall clearly mark his complain t "Amended Complaint". The amended complaint must include all of Plaintiff's claims in this action and should not refer back to the original complaint. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order then the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on October 4, 2017. (kcc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
