DAVIS v. HARLOW et al
| ANGELO LENELL DAVIS |
| SGT. MICHNIAK, SGT. MATTHEWS, MR. G. BAKER, MR. ODDO MITCHELL, MR. BUPKA, MS. CARLA SWARTZ, MS. LORINDA WINFIELD, MR. TIM MACKNAIR, MS. SUE COWAN, MR. DAVID SWARTZ, MR. LOUIS FOLINO, MS. TRACY SHAWLEY, MR. FREDDY NUNEZ, MICHAEL HARLOW, MS. DONNA NICKOLAS, MS. TINA STALEY, SGT. YOUNG and DORINA VARNER |
| 2:2011cv01506 |
| November 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Greene |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
ORDER granting 97 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on August 26, 2014. (kcc)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER re 102 Notice of Appeal filed by ANGELO LENELL DAVIS. Because all parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal to the District Judge is construed as a motion f or reconsideration and denied for the reasons stated in the Court's Orders dated October 11, 2013 and November 14, 2013. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court's Scheduling Order (ECF No. 101) is modified to read that Plaintiff shall be allow ed until January 8, 2013, to respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff still desires to appeal the Court's Scheduling Order and the Orders denying his motions regarding discovery, then he mu st file a Notice of Appeal to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and either pay the $505.00 filing fee or submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on December 11, 2013. (kcc) Modified on 12/11/2013. (jv2, )
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER granting in part, denying in part, and denying without prejudice in part 49 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. It is further ORDERED that all claims in Plaintiff's Second Amended Complain are dismissed with prejudice except for Plaintiff's retaliation claims against Defendants Cowan, Nickolas, Swartz, Macknair, Staley, Guyton, Burris, Winfield, Matthews, Bupka, Baker, Mitchell and Rogers. It is further ORDERED that Defendants may reassert their argument regarding exhaustion of administrative remedies in a properly filed motion for summary judgment. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall direct the United States Marshal to mail a copy of Plaintiff's Second Amended COmplaint, notice of lawsuit and requ est for waiver of service of summons, and waiver, to Defendants Rogers, Guyton and Burris. Cost of service shall be advanaced by the United States. Defendants are requested to waive service pursuant to Rule 4(d). Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on March 22, 2013. (kcc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
