Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Angelo Davis v. Greene SCI, et al
as 16-2010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELO LENELL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS GREENE SCI, County, MS. IRMA VIHLIDAL, NEDRA GREGO and others
Davis v. Harry et al
as 1:2016cv00357
Petitioner:
Angelo Lenell Davis
Respondent:
Laurel Harry and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. PA Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00370
Plaintiff:
Angelo Lenell Davis
Defendant:
PA Department of Corrections, Laurel Harry, Jan Digby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Harry et al
as 1:2015cv01807
Petitioner:
Angelo Lenell Davis
Respondent:
Laurel Harry and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2015cv00503
Plaintiff:
ANGELO LENELL DAVIS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, IRMA VIHLIDAL, NEDRA GREGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv01551
Plaintiff:
ANGELO LENELL DAVIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LOUIS FOLINO, MICHAEL GUYTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angelo Davis v. Michael Harlow, et al
as 14-4172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELO LENELL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HARLOW, Acting Deputy Secretary of Corrections
Angelo Davis v. Louis Folino, et al
as 13-1315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELO LENELL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Davis v. Folino et al
as 1:2012cv00205
Petitioner:
Angelo Lenell Davis
Respondent:
Louis Folino and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2011cv01506
Plaintiff:
ANGELO LENELL DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL HARLOW, DORINA VARNER, MR. LOUIS FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
