WOODS v. HAMMER et al
| ROBERT F. WOODS |
| MARK HAMMER, WOOD, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, C.C.S. and MARK CAPOZZA |
| 2:2015cv01090 |
| August 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Maureen P. Kelly |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 106 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 115 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff's claims for denial of access to cou rts and for retaliation are dismissed. Defendant Carol Scire is dismissed from the case. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 5/4/16. A copy of this Opinion and Order will be mailed this day, 5/4/16, to Plaintiff at his address of record. (ard)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER denying 78 Motion for an Order on the Plaintif's Original T.R.O. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 12/9/15. A copy of this Order will be mailed this day, 12/9/15, to Plaintiff at his address of record. (ard)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER denying 34 Motion for No Transfer Because of this Civil Action. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 10/16/15. A copy of this Order will be mailed this day, 10/16/15, to Plaintiff at his address of record. (ard)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
