RAWLS v. GIBBS et al
SAMEECH RAWLS |
GIBBS, MICHAEL GUYTON, ROBERT D. GILMORE, CUMBERLEDGE and DURCO |
2:2016cv01438 |
September 19, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Greene |
Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 128 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 107 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants and mark this case CLOSED. Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on August 27, 2021. (kcb) |
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER dismissing 7 Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and dismissing as moot 19 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of Court is to mark this case CLOSED. Plaintiff has thirty days in which to file a notice of appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on February 12, 2019. (kcc) |
Filing 26 ORDER dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 7) with prejudice; dismissing as moot 19 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Clerk is to mark this CASE CLOSED. Plaintiff has thirty (30) days in which to file a notice of appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on June 29, 2017. (kcc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.