Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Wickline et al v. Cumberledge et al
as 2:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Jason Wickline and Shanna Wickline
Defendant:
Cpl. T. J. Cumberledge, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cumberledge v. USA
as 1:2023cv02350
Petitioner:
Todd B. Cumberledge
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wright v. Cumberledge et al
as 5:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Paula J. Wright
Defendant:
Paul Raymond Cumberledge and Tralo Companies, Inc. doing business as Tralo Enterprises, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Trumbull Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
RAWLS v. GUYTON et al
as 2:2022cv01751
Plaintiff:
SAMEECH RAWLS
Defendant:
MICHAEL GUYTON, MR. GIBBS, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMBERLEDGE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14385
Plaintiff:
BRANDON ALLEN CUMBERLEDGE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CUMBERLEDGE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15472
Plaintiff:
BRYAN CUMBERLEDGE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sameech Rawls v. Gibbs, et al
as 22-2101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMEECH RAWLS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. GIBBS, Kitchen Staff Member, SCI Greene, MICHAEL GUYTON, Unit Manager, SCI Greene, ROBERT GILMORE, Facility Manager, SCI Greene and others
USA v. Todd Cumberledge
as 22-3344
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TODD B. CUMBERLEDGE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Cumberledge et al v. Barnett Outdoors LLC
as 8:2021cv01833
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cumberledge and Sandra Cumberledge
Defendant:
Barnett Outdoors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
