ZAMICHIELI v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
| LAMONT ZAMICHIELI |
| PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIAM NICHOLSON, NATALIE D. AUSTIN, LORI RIDINGS, TINA STALEY, SPIKER, MIKE HICE, VALLI, LIPTAK, PRICE, KAREN SOKOL, MARK DIALESANDRO, DAN CARO, ROBERT GILMORE and TRACY SHAWLEY |
| 2:2017cv00742 |
| June 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
160
MEMORANDUM OPINION, indicating that for the reasons more fully stated within, the motion for summary judgment filed by the Commonwealth Defendants 101 , the motion for summary judgment filed by Dr. Valley 96 , and the motion for summary judgment filed by the Medical Defendants 122 are GRANTED and the motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff 126 is DENIED. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 09/09/2019. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 44 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM re 40 Amended Complaint filed by LORI RIDINGS, MIKE HICE, NATALIE D. AUSTIN, 49 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by ROBERT VALLEY. See Memorandum Opinion for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 6/5/2018. (sms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
