COGER v. PATRICK et al
| FREDERICK COGER |
| ROBERT PATRICK, JR., WILLIAM P. MULLEN, KARA N. TEMPLETON, JOANNA L. WILLIAMS, CYNTHIA R. JOHNSON, GEORGE H. SMILEY, BARBARA MINER and PATRICK QUIN, JR. |
| 2:2017cv01413 |
| November 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM ORDER. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 13 , 16 , 20 , 27 , 28 & 34 ) are GRANTED. Any attempt to amend the pleadings would be futile, for the reasons described in the Magistrate Judge's R&R. Thus, Plaintiff's more recent Motion (Doc. 42 ) for leave to amend is DENIED, and the dismissal of this case is with prejudice. Furthermore, Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 24 ) for default judgment against Defendant Cynthia R. Johnson is DENIED, for the reasons stat ed in the R&R; and the same reasoning extends to Plaintiff's recently-filed request for default and default judgment (Doc. 41 ) against Cynthia R. Johnson and Barbara Miner, which likewise is DENIED. Finally, the Magistrate Judge's R&R (Doc. 38 ) hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 7/10/18. (dcd) Staff note: a copy of this filing will be sent, via First-Class U.S. Mail, to the pro se litigants in this case on 7/11/18.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
