Cases 1 - 10 of 18
STROUD et al v. BUTLER et al
as 2:2019cv01289
Defendant:
JAMES A. MOTZNIK, ROBERT P. RAVENSTAHL, JR., PRESIDENT JUDGE KIM BERKELEY CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
POSTINDUSTRIAL and MATT STROUD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITTLE v. TUBE CITY RENAISSANCE et al
as 2:2019cv00172
Plaintiff:
WAYNE LITTLE
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MULLEN and TUBE CITY RENAISSANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
COGER v. PATRICK et al
as 2:2017cv01413
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK COGER
Defendant:
ROBERT PATRICK, JR., WILLIAM P. MULLEN, KARA N. TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. MULLEN
as 2:2017cv01366
Petitioner:
BRIAN JONES
Respondent:
SHERIFF WILLIAM P. MULLEN , ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA , ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOVE v. MULLEN et al
as 2:2017cv00746
Plaintiff:
MENDO ROMAN LOVE
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MULLEN and GREG RENKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRACKEN et al v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BRACKEN , WILLIAM DEFORTE , WILLIAM JACKSON and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MULLEN, CHELSA WAGNER, JOHN FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEEDHAM v. MULLEN et al
as 2:2013cv01829
Plaintiff:
AMY J. NEEDHAM
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MULLEN , JOHN KEARNEY , JARED KULIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard DiLauri v. William Mullen
as 13-2429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DILAURI
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM P. MULLEN, Sheriff in official and individual capacities
Richard Dilauri v. William Mullen, et al
as 11-2847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DILAURI
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM P. MULLEN, Sheriff, in official and individual capacities, RAMON RUSTIN, Warden, in official and individual capacities, JANE DOE and others
CARTER v. MULLEN et al
as 2:2011cv00825
Plaintiff:
PARIS CARTER
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MULLEN and ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
