BANKS v. ROE, etal
||ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESSAR, SOO SONG, SEAN LANGFORD, ROBERT WERNER, SCOTT SMITH, MIKE POMPEO, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
||July 31, 2017
||US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
||XX US, Outside State
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 4, 2017
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. For the reasons stated in the Order attached herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice. PLAINTIFF IS PUT ON EXPLICIT NOTICE THAT ALL FUTURE NON-COMPLIANT FILINGS WILL NOT BE DOCKETED BY THE COURT, BUT RATHER WILL BE RETURNED TO PLAINTIFF WITHOUT FURTHER EXPLANATION. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 8/4/2017. (kg)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?