HILL v. WETZEL et al
LAVOND A HILL |
DR. RAMIREZ, ROBERT GILMORE, BRITTNY CHIAVETTI, ALICIA BERGER, SUTTON, JOHN DOE, DUSTIN DREHER, COIII. LT. LEGGETT, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, SCI GREENE C/O HOLLOWOOD, JELLOTS, MICHAEL ZAKEN, LISA FISCUS, JOHN E. WETZEL, MORRIS, GILL, T WERXMAN, MARK DIALESANDRO and MACEK |
2:2019cv00960 |
August 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Keith A Pesto |
Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MOTION for Magistrate Judge to be Recused by LAVOND A HILL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (mao) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by LAVOND A HILL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (mao) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by LAVOND A HILL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (plp) |
Filing 11 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by LAVOND A HILL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (plp) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply and as more fully stated in said order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 8/26/2019. (plp) |
Filing 8 DECLARATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT by LAVOND A HILL. (Attachments: #1 correspondence, #2 Envelope) (plp) |
Filing 7 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by ALICIA BERGER, PUSHKALAI PILLAI. (Neal, Cassidy) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint by ALICIA BERGER, PUSHKALAI PILLAI. (Neal, Cassidy) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; BRITTNY CHIAVETTI answer due 9/6/2019; MARK DIALESANDRO answer due 9/6/2019; LISA FISCUS answer due 9/6/2019; GILL answer due 9/6/2019; ROBERT GILMORE answer due 9/6/2019; HOLLOWOOD answer due 9/6/2019; JELLOTS answer due 9/6/2019; LEGGETT answer due 9/6/2019; MACEK answer due 9/6/2019; MORRIS answer due 9/6/2019; RAMIREZ answer due 9/6/2019; SUTTON answer due 9/6/2019; T WERXMAN answer due 9/6/2019; JOHN E. WETZEL answer due 9/6/2019; MICHAEL ZAKEN answer due 9/6/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 8/8/2019. (plp) |
Filing 4 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by BRITTNY CHIAVETTI, MARK DIALESANDRO, GILL, ROBERT GILMORE, HOLLOWOOD, JELLOTS, LEGGETT, MACEK, MORRIS, RAMIREZ, SUTTON, T WERXMAN, JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL ZAKEN. (Mazzocca, Timothy) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by BRITTNY CHIAVETTI, MARK DIALESANDRO, LISA FISCUS, GILL, ROBERT GILMORE, HOLLOWOOD, JELLOTS, LEGGETT, MACEK, MORRIS, RAMIREZ, SUTTON, T WERXMAN, JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL ZAKEN. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Mazzocca, Timothy) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Mazzocca on behalf of BRITTNY CHIAVETTI, MARK DIALESANDRO, LISA FISCUS, GILL, ROBERT GILMORE, HOLLOWOOD, JELLOTS, LEGGETT, MACEK, MORRIS, RAMIREZ, SUTTON, T WERXMAN, JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL ZAKEN. (Mazzocca, Timothy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas of Greene County, case number 504-AD-2019 Copies attached: Complaint and documents filed to original case (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5236932), filed by PUSHKALAI PILLAI, ALICIA BERGER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C) (plp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.