VO v. GILMORE et al
THUY VAN VO |
ROBERT GILMORE, WILLIAM NICHOLSON, MICHAEL HICE, JAMES FETTERMAN and SECURE CARE |
2:2021cv01621 |
November 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Cynthia Reed Eddy |
Maureen P Kelly |
Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR STATISTICAL CLOSING. This action may not proceed unless the Plaintiff either, 1) tenders to the "Clerk, U.S. District Court" the amount of $402.00 (the statutory filing fee of $350.00, plus a $52.00 administrative fee), or, 2) files a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, including a certified copy of his inmate account statement. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case administratively CLOSED. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 11/23/2021. (cmc) |
Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER FOR PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 11/22/2021. (cmc) |
Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy presiding. Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly no longer assigned to case. (lyk) |
|
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by THUY VAN VO. (Attachments: #1 Authorization, #2 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #3 Envelope) (keh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.