Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04066
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
VO v. GILMORE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01621
Plaintiff: THUY VAN VO
Defendant: ROBERT GILMORE, WILLIAM NICHOLSON, MICHAEL HICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brooks v. Hogan
as 21-1785
Plaintiff / Appellant: Charles Brooks
Defendant / Appellee: Michael Hogan, Former OMH Commissioner, Richard P. Miraglia, Former Associate Commissioner, OMH, Maureen Bosco, Executive Director, CNYPC and others
Defendant: Emmet Creahan, Director of Mental Hygiene Legal Service, Fourth Department, Michael J. Hungerford, Deputy Chief Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department, Janine E. Rella, Principal Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department and others
Brooks v. Hogan
as 21-1571
Defendant / Appellee: Richard P. Miraglia, Former Associate Commissioner, OMH, Anthony Gonzalez, Director of Risk Management, Central New York Psychiatric Center, Michael Larkin, SCTA-2; Office of Mental Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Charles Brooks
Defendant: Janine E. Rella, Principal Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department, Dr. Kumar Bahl, Psychiatrist, Central New York Psychiatric Center, Craig P. Schlanger, Senior Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department and others
Brooks v. Hogan
as 20-1779
Defendant / Appellee: Richard P. Miraglia, Former Associate Commissioner, OMH, Anthony Gonzalez, Director of Risk Management, Central New York Psychiatric Center, Michael Larkin, SCTA-2; Office of Mental Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Charles Brooks
Defendant: Janine E. Rella, Principal Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department, Dr. Kumar Bahl, Psychiatrist, Central New York Psychiatric Center, Craig P. Schlanger, Senior Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department and others
Aiello v. Lamitie
as 20-1164
Plaintiff: Maurice Mims, Gerald Krouth, Glenn Thomas and others
Defendant / Appellee: Charmaine Bill, Treatment Team Leader, Timothy Hyde, Supervising Secure Care Treatment Aide, CNYPC, Emily Gray, Social Worker II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Joseph Roesch
Defendant: Michael Kehoe, Supervising Secure Care Treatment Aide, CNYPC, Eric Hall, Secure Care Treatment Aide, Kevin Hluska, Supervising Secure Care Treatment Aide, CNYPC and others
Brooks v. Hogan
as 20-675
Defendant: Donald Sawyer, Former Central New York Psychiatric Center Executive Director, Dr. Terri Maxymillian, Chief of Psychology Central New York Psychiatric Center, Kyle Velte, Former Psychologist Central New York Psychiatric Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Charles Brooks
Defendant / Appellee: Laura Creaser Smith, Former Nurse Central New York Psychiatric Center, Elizabeth Farnum, Psychiatrist Central New York Psychiatric Center, David Parrish, Secure Care Treatment Assistant Central New York Psychiatric Center and others
Haden v. Hellinger
as 17-3300
Plaintiff - Appellant: Robert Haden
Defendant - Appellee: Maura Pavlot, RN, CNYPC, Jason Searcy, Secure Care Treatment Aide, CNYPC, Karl Hellinger, Secure Care Treatment Aide, CNYPC and others
Defendant: Quaseem Piracha, Secure Care Treatment Aide, CNYPC, Cindy Comstock, Nurse Administrator, CNYPC, John Santamassino, Secure Care Treatment Aide, CNYPC and others
Daniel Rouster v. Saginaw County, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1673
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL ROUSTER, PR
Defendant: SAGINAW COUNTY, ALVIN RIMMER, Shift Commander, MICHAEL VANHORN, Officer and others
Defendant - Appellee: SECURE CARE, INCORPORATED, CATHLEEN CONLEY, RMA, STELLA MENCHACA, LPN and others
Mark White v. Secure Care Company, et al
as 11-1516
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK EARL WHITE
Defendant - Appellee: SECURE CARE COMPANY, ELAINE KAISER and JOE NATOLE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?