SPUCK v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
| DANIEL L. SPUCK |
| PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and ALAN ROBINSON |
| 3:2010cv00159 |
| June 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Johnstown Office |
| Clearfield |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 34 Motion to Dismiss; denying 42 Motion to Supplement Newly Discovered Evidence; 43 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated 6/4/2012, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 7/19/2012. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss; granting 14 Motion to Dismiss; granting 18 Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is revoked. It is further Ordered that Plaintiff has 20 days from this date to pay the filin g fee of $350. If the filing fee is not paid within the time allotted, the complaint will be dismissed. It is further Ordered that Plaintiff's motion to strike (Doc. No. 22 ) is denied; 26 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated 5/10/2011, is adopted as the opinion of the court, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 8/1/2011. (dlg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
