FENNELL v. CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON, et al
ROBERT FENNELL |
CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HALE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CASHOFF, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LEVERKNIGHT, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE #2, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE #3, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE #4, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LT. JOHN DOE #5 and CITY EBENSBURG |
3:2012cv00021 |
February 2, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Johnstown Office |
Cambria |
Kim R. Gibson |
Keith A. Pesto |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 123 MEMORANDUM ORDER - it is Ordered that summary judgment is granted to defendants Hale and Leverknight on the remaining claim in this matter; 117 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 7/20/2016. (dlg) |
Filing 66 MEMORANDUM ORDER - it is ORDERED that defendants Hale and Leverknight's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 35 , is granted. The Report and Recommendation at docket no. 57 as supplemented at docket no. 63 is adopted as the opinion of th e Court. The recommendations at docket no. 5 and docket no. 30 are adopted in the absence of objection. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 9/25/2013. (dlg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.