Cases 1 - 10 of 25
FENNELL
as 3:2025cv15750
Petitioner:
ROBERT FENNELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FENNELL v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2025cv15750
Petitioner:
ROBERT FENNELL
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Alexander Randles
as 24-12917
Respondent:
BALDWIN COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT CUSTODIAL AGENT, P. DAVID MATHENY, L. D. OWEN, III and others
Petitioner:
In re: ALEXANDER RANDLES
Robert Fennell v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-1370
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT FENNELL
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, JAMEY P. LUTHER, Superintendent at SCI Smithfield and HARPSTER, Correctional Officer SCI Smithfield
Robert Fennell v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-1364
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT FENNELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BERNADETTE MASON, CHARLES STETLER and others
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2022cv00880
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Bernadette Mason, Charles Stetler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2021cv01717
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
Secretary John E. Wetzel, Superintendent Jamey P. Luther, Officer Harpster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael et al v. McKeon et al
as 7:2021cv01353
Defendant:
Robert McKeon, Town Board of the Town of Red Hook, Robert Fennell and others
Plaintiff:
George Michael, Dominic Tampone and Cathy Michael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Robert Fennell v. John E. Wetzel, et al
as 20-3575
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O BANEY, JOHN E. WETZEL and LYNNE GONZALEZ
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT FENNELL
Robert Fennell v. John Wetzel, et al
as 20-1950
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT FENNELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN WETZEL and JOHN E. WETZEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
