JERRY-EL v. WETZEL et al
| BERNARD C. JERRY-EL |
| MELISSA HAINSWORTH, PAUL NOEL, JAWAD SALAMEH, REX BECKNOR, DR. JULIAN DANCHA, JOHN E. WETZEL, DR. JAY COWAN and CHRISTOPHER OPPMAN |
| 3:2018cv00216 |
| October 31, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Kim R Gibson |
| Keith A Pesto |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 OBJECTIONS to #2 Report and Recommendation by BERNARD C. JERRY-EL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ept) |
Filing 2
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 proposed complaint, recommending that if petitioner does not take steps to pay the filing fee within one month, this matter should be dismissed for failure to prosecute; (Objections to R&R due by 11/15/2018, Objections to R&R for Unregistered ECF Users due by 11/19/2018), ORDER FOR STATISTICAL CLOSING; the Clerk shall mark this matter administratively closed until plaintiff submits the filing fee as more fully stated in said order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 11/1/2018. (plp)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint lodged pending receipt of filing fee or disposition of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis received. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope) (plp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
