Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plummer v. Dancha et al
as 1:2023cv00892
Plaintiff: William Plummer
Defendant: Dr. Andrew Dancha and Dr. Jay Cowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Turner v. Wetzel, et al
as 21-2879
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM D. TURNER
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Corrections, CORRECTION CARE SOLUTION, CARL KELDIE and others
ROBINSON v. NAJI et al
as 3:2020cv00222
Defendant: DR. JAY COWAN and DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI
Plaintiff: SAVOY ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BOYD v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv03058
Defendant: JOHN STEINHART, DR. THOMAS LEHMAN, DR. LITTLES and others
Plaintiff: FRANCIS BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEARSON v. NOEL et al
as 2:2019cv00177
Plaintiff: RICKY PEARSON
Defendant: DR. PAUL NOEL, ROBERT GILMORE, MR. HAMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01476
Defendant: ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff: JAMES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00355
Defendant: ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff: JAMES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JERRY-EL v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2018cv00216
Plaintiff: BERNARD C. JERRY-EL
Defendant: MELISSA HAINSWORTH, PAUL NOEL, JAWAD SALAMEH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv09709
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARPER v. NOEL et al
as 2:2018cv04163
Defendant: DR. PAUL NOEL, SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, CHCA KOWALEWSKI and others
Plaintiff: ANTHONY HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?