Salicrup-De Jesus v. Hernandez-Perez et al
Domingo Salicrup-De Jesus |
Eligio Hernandez-Perez, Yovanna Gonzalez-Torres, Carlos Mendez, Grisell Batalla, Wendy Colon-Martinez and Sarai Resto |
3:2020cv01011 |
January 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Francisco A Besosa |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER re #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel: DENIED. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 01/16/2020. (brc) |
Filing 4 ORDER re #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: DENIED. Plaintiff has sufficient asset to pay fees and costs. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 01/16/2020. (brc) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Domingo Salicrup-De Jesus, Pro Se. Responses due by 1/28/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(ab) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Domingo Salicrup-De Jesus, Pro Se. Service due by 4/13/2020, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Summons)(ab) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Domingo Salicrup-De Jesus, Pro Se. Responses due by 1/28/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (ab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.