Harris v. Riley et al
| Frederick Jermaine Harris |
| Tim Riley and Alan Wilson |
| 0:2014cv00187 |
| January 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Rock Hill Office |
| Greenville |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Mary G Lewis |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER adopting 51 Report and Recommendation. It is the judgment of this Court that Respondent's 38 Motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Petitioner's 1 habeas petition is DISMISSED as untimely. To the extent that Petitioner requests a certificate of appealability from this Court, that request is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 1/30/15. (kmca)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER re 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tim Riley. The petitioner has failed to respond to the motion. As such, it appears to the court that he does not oppose the motion and wishes to abandon this action. Based on the foregoing, it is ORDERED that the petitioner shall advise the court as to whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to the respondents motion for summary judgment within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. The petitioner is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 10/1/2014. (gmil)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
