Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Tiny Zaps Co. v. McDonald et al
as 2:2026cv02895
Plaintiff:
Tiny Zaps Co., Joshua McDonald and Stephanie McDonald
Defendant:
Dr. Brannon Traxler and Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Wilson
as 6:2026cv02250
Plaintiff:
Michael Howard Lewis
Defendant:
Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Levarn Henry v. The State of South Carolina
as 26-6658
Plaintiff:
LEVARN HENRY, a/k/a Levern Henry
Defendant:
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA and HONORABLE ALAN WILSON
John Gruff v. Henry McMaster
as 26-6616
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY GRUFF
Defendant:
HENRY MCMASTER, Governor of South Carolina, MAGISTRATE HENDRICKS, ALAN WILSON, Attorney General of South Carolina and others
STEWART v. BRYANT et al
as 2:2026cv03588
Petitioner:
BEN ROBERT STEWART
Respondent:
ANGIE BRYANT, KEVIN S. BRACKETT, ALAN WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-6608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Talford v. Attorney General Alan Wilson
as 6:2026cv01517
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Talford
Defendant:
Attorney General Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Laura Grice v. Ron DeSantis
as 26-1365
Plaintiff:
LAURA ELIZABETH GRICE
Defendant:
GOVERNOR RON DESANTIS, in his individual and official capacity as Governor for the State of Florida, GOVERNOR HENRY MCMASTER, in his individual capaicty as governor of the State of South Carolina, ATTORNEY GENERAL ALAN WILSON, in his individual and official capacity as Attorney General of the State of South Carolina and others
Quintavis McGee v. Alan Wilson
as 26-6252
Plaintiff:
QUINTAVIS DESHON MCGEE
Defendant:
ALAN WILSON, Attorney General
Netchoice v. Wilson
as 3:2026cv00543
Plaintiff:
Netchoice
Defendant:
Alan Wilson
Intervenor:
Governor Henry Dargan McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.