Cottone v. Warden Janson
Petitioner: Michael Cottone
Respondent: Warden Janson
Case Number: 0:2024cv00376
Filed: January 25, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Jacquelyn D Austin
Referring Judge: Richard M Gergel
2 Judge: Paige J Gossett
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2024 Filing 17 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #12 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus served on The Attorney General for the United States. on 03/11/2024. (apsn)
March 4, 2024 Filing 16 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 600009912. (apsn)
March 4, 2024 Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 13 Clerk' Notice, #12 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Michael Cottone 40510509 F.C.I. Edgefield P.O. Box 725 Edgefield, SC 29824. (apsn)
March 4, 2024 Filing 13 Clerk's Notice: #11 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis addressed in #12 Order. (apsn)
March 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 03/01/2024. (Attachments: #1 Habeas Petition)(apsn)
February 26, 2024 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Michael Cottone. Response to Motion due by 3/11/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(apsn)
February 16, 2024 Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 7 Case Reassigned placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Michael Cottone 40510509 F.C.I. Edgefield P.O. Box 725 Edgefield, SC 29824. (apsn,)
February 16, 2024 Filing 7 Case Reassigned to Judge Jacquelyn D Austin. Judge Richard M Gergel no longer assigned to the case. (suro, )
February 1, 2024 Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order, Form AO 240, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Michael Cottone 40510509 F.C.I. Edgefield P.O. Box 725 Edgefield, SC 29824. (apsn)
February 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 2/22/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 02/01/2024. (apsn)
January 25, 2024 Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Anderson/Greenwood. (apsn)
January 25, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Cottone. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(apsn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cottone v. Warden Janson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Cottone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Janson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?