Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Cottone v. Warden Janson
as 0:2024cv00376
Petitioner: Michael Cottone
Respondent: Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Michael Cotton et al. v. Credit Acceptance Corp
as 1:2023mc00519
Petitioner: Michael Cotton and Leah Cotton
Respondent: Credit Acceptance Corp
USA v. Michael Cottone
as 23-13663
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL COTTONE
Cottone v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv02182
Petitioner: Michael Cottone
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Cottone v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00307
Plaintiff: Michael Cottone
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
COTTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv63905
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL COTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boerste v. Ellis, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00298
Plaintiff: Bryan Tyler Boerste
Defendant: Ellis Towing, LLC , City of Springfield, Kentucky , Springfield Police Department and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Ellis Towing, LLC
Thirdparty_defendant: Michael Cotton , Saint Catharine College, Inc. , Mattingly Security, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02540
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Michael Cotton v. Ian Wallace
as 16-2699
Petitioner: Michael Cotton
Respondent: Ian Wallace, Warden
Cotton v. Wallace We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00358
Petitioner: Michael Cotton
Respondent: Ian Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?