-SVH Sharp v. South Carolina Department Corrections et al
| Brian Sharp |
| Leonard Longe, Jerry Alexander and Tim Riley |
| 1:2009cv02402 |
| November 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Aiken Office |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. This court finds the Magistrate Judge's recommendation fairly and accurately summarizes the facts and applies the correct principles of law. The Report is incorporated herein by reference. Accordingly, the defendants' motion for summary judgment 32 is granted and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 2/7/2011. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, dismissing defendant SCDC without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 11/3/09. (rpol, )
|
|
Filing
8
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant that the District Court dismiss the South Carolina Department of Corrections without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 10/5/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 9/17/09. (rpol, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
