Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Profit Velocity Solutions, LLC v. Sharp
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Profit Velocity Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Brian Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Washington v. Dayton Area Board of Realtors et al
as 3:2021cv00253
Defendant:
Mark Kottman, Dayton Area Board of Realtors, Tom Whalen and others
Plaintiff:
James E. Washintgon and James E Washington
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv67664
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SHARP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv75684
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SHARP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHARPE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv28123
Plaintiff:
SHARPE and BRIAN SHARPE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv04899
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SHARP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv02137
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SHARP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks et al v. Illusions, Inc et al
as 5:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ashley Brooks , Brian Sharp and Rachel Leblanc
Defendant:
Illusions, Inc and Thomas Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00942
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Griffith v. Garcia et al
as 1:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
James Griffith
Defendant:
Delmiro Garcia, Robin Young, Dennis Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
