Glass v. Hill et al
Plaintiff: Walter Glass
Defendant: Tyatta Davis, Jasmine Hill, Wali Khan and Cunningham
Case Number: 1:2020cv01972
Filed: May 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Referring Judge: Sherri A Lydon
Nature of Suit: Prison:Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER adopting the 98 Report and Recommendation, granting Defendants' 84 motion for summary judgment and denying Plaintiff's 75 , 88 motions for summary judgment. Signed by Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on 12/16/2021. (lbak)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 98 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER recommending the district judge grant Defendants' 84 motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiff's 75 , 88 motions for summary judgment. (Objections to R&R due by 11/29/2 021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45.), ORDER denying Plaintiff's 66 , 82 motions to appoint counsel and for discovery, granting Plaintiff's 74 motion for sanctions, awarding him the cost of his copying fees in the amount of $254. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 11/10/2021. (lbak) Modified on 11/10/2021 to clarify docket text. (lbak)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER recommiting this case to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) for issuance of a report and recommendation on the dispositive pre-trial motions. Judge Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges added. Signed by Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on 11/9/2021. (lbak) (Main Document 96 replaced on 11/9/2021 with corrected scan of document.) (lbak)
June 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 71 OPINION AND ORDER granting Plaintiff's 67 motion for sanctions. Pursuant to Rule 37(b)(2)(A)(iv), proceedings in this action are STAYED for thirty days or until Defendants comply with the Magistrate Judge's 61 o rder. If Defendants fail to comply within thirty days, the Court will prohibit Defendants from supporting or opposing designated claims or defenses or from introducing designated matters in evidence pursuant to Rule 37(b)(2)(A)(ii). Signed by Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on 6/14/2021. (lbak)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER directing Clerk to forward the file to the United States District Judge for trial. Judge Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges no longer assigned to case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 5/3/2021. (lbak)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER granting 60 Motion to Compel. Defendants are directed to provide responses to the discovery requests by May 7, 2021. Defendants are advised that failure to comply with the court's order may result in sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 4/23/2021. (lbak)
February 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER denying 43 motion "to dispositive responce", denying 44 motion for issuance of subpoena and granting 42 motion to produce. The motion is construed as Plaintiff's First Request for Production o f Documents, and Defendants are directed to respond to Plaintiff's request no later than March 2, 2021. To the extend either party needs additional time to file dispositive motions, that party can file the appropriate motion requesting an extension of time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 2/1/2021. (lbak)
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER adopting the 30 Report and Recommendation and dismissing Defendant Cunningham with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on 1/29/2021. (lbak)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER directing Plaintiff to complete a Form USM-285 that provides additional information to allow the USMS to serve defendant by October 6, 2020. If Plaintiff fails to do so, the undersigned will recommend Cunningham be dismissed. (Specific Document due by 10/6/2020.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 9/22/2020. (lbak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Glass v. Hill et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Walter Glass
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tyatta Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jasmine Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wali Khan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?