Cases 1 - 10 of 6,249
Negron v. Marion Eye Center et al
as 3:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Angel Negron
Defendant:
Marion Eye Center, DeeDee Brookhart and Lori Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Cunningham et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Theron Hunter
Defendant:
Unknown Cunningham, Unknown Gaskill, Unknown Felver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Demarlowe Cunningham
as 24-1346
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DEMARLOWE CUNNINGHAM
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sorrell v. Garcia et al
as 1:2024cv03099
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Sorrell
Defendant:
Julio Garcia, Donald Cunningham and Village of University Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cunningham v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2024cv02876
Plaintiff:
Jane Cunningham
Defendant:
Sonia Gonzalez, Teresa Christof and JPM Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Cunningham v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2024cv02876
Plaintiff:
Jane Cunningham
Defendant:
Sonia Gonzalez, Teresa Ann Christof, Doe Defendants #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
CUNNINGHAM v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00662
Petitioner:
KEVIN CUNNINGHAM
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Cunningham et al
as 2:2024cv10989
Plaintiff:
Theron Hunter
Defendant:
Cunningham, Gaskill, Felver and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
