Cases 1 - 10 of 52
CUNNINGHAM v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02347
Plaintiff:
ARIANE CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and DOES 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GENESIS CAPITAL, LLC v. CUNNINGHAM JR. et al
as 1:2023cv01116
Plaintiff:
GENESIS CAPITAL, LLC
Defendant:
RICHARD CUNNINGHAM JR. and ELAINE MARION CUNNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv02515
Plaintiff:
Nefeteria Cunningham and NO PARTY
Not Classified By Court:
Boubacar Fane
Defendant:
UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
FANE et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2022cv02516
Plaintiff:
Nefeteria Cunningham and Boubacar Fane
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK B. GARLAND and UR M. JADDOU
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
CLERVRAIN v. MARA et al
as 1:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN and FRANCIS COBBINA OSEI-FOSU
Defendant:
PATRICK MARA, RENEE MCDONALD HUTCHINS, TIM COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
CUNNINGHAM v. BEASON
as 1:2021cv00375
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM T. CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
ELIZABETH BEASON and ELIZABETH L. BEASON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CUNNINGHAM v. WRIGHT
as 1:2021cv00187
Defendant:
ZACHARY WRIGHT
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM T. CUNNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
