Cases 1 - 10 of 567
Cunningham v. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust
as 3:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Therese Cunningham
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust d/b/a Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Negron v. Marion Eye Center et al
as 3:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Angel Negron
Defendant:
Marion Eye Center, DeeDee Brookhart and Lori Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorrell v. Garcia et al
as 1:2024cv03099
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Sorrell
Defendant:
Julio Garcia, Donald Cunningham and Village of University Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CUNNINGHAM v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00662
Petitioner:
KEVIN CUNNINGHAM
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster v. City of Chicago Police et al
as 1:2024cv02920
Plaintiff:
Cortez Foster
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police, Calvin Blunt, Jeffrey Hanssen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuhlman v. Hines et al
as 1:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Kuhlman
Defendant:
Officer Nicholas Hines, Officer Serena Cunningham and Town of Normal, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robinson v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
George Robinson
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, Lorie Cunningham, Wexford Health Source, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Luking et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Malik Shabazz
Defendant:
Carrissa Luking, Laurie Cunningham and Percy Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
