Anthony v. The Boeing Company
| Chris Anthony and Curtis Anthony |
| The Boeing Company |
| 2:2019cv01656 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Bristow Marchant |
| David C Norton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 TEXT ORDER Defendant has filed a motion to stay deadlines and entry of a scheduling order pending resolution of its partial motion to dismiss. However, after the filing of that motion, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint which dropped two of the three causes of action at issue in the pending partial motion to dismiss. See Rule 15 (A)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. Therefore, based on the current status of the case, Defendant's partial motion to dismiss, its motion to stay deadlines and entry of a scheduling order, and its motion to extend time to file a Reply are now moot. Further, even if the Defendant files a new partial motion to dismiss (as its responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint) as to the only remaining cause of action that was at issue in its former motion to dismiss, four other causes of action are in the Complaint. Therefore, a scheduling order will be issued after a responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint is filed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 07/25/2019.(egra, ) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 Response in Opposition to Motion, by The Boeing Company. Response to Motion due by 8/7/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(Floyd, William) |
| Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Curtis Anthony.(Gist, Donald) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Curtis Anthony.Reply to Response to Motion due by 7/25/2019 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Gist, Donald) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Curtis Anthony, filed by Curtis Anthony. (Attachments: #1 Summons, (Gist, Donald) Modified on 7/24/2019 Attachments deleted and refiled as entries #11 and 12 (egra, ). Modified on 7/25/2019 to edit docket text (egra, ). |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Stay Deadlines and Entry of Scheduling Order by The Boeing Company. Response to Motion due by 7/22/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(Floyd, William) |
| Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by The Boeing Company.(Floyd, William) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by The Boeing Company.(Floyd, William) |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by The Boeing Company. Response to Motion due by 7/22/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit 1 - EEO Policy, #3 Exhibit 2 - Workplace and Sexual Harassment Procedure)No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(Floyd, William) |
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by The Boeing Company.(hada, ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to The Boeing Company. (hada, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Boeing Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8492377.), filed by Chris Anthony. Service due by 9/5/2019. (hada, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
