Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Young v. Spyker et al
as 1:2023cv01839
Plaintiff:
Curtis Anthony Young
Defendant:
Ms. Spyker, Mr. Kohler, Ms. Loy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13437
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ANTHONY ADAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VINES II v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13109
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ANTHONY VINES II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. VisionQuest National, LTD.
as 2:2023cv01815
Plaintiff:
Curtis Anthony Young
Defendant:
VisionQuest National, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
Jones v. Nueces County
as 2:2021cv00299
Plaintiff:
Curtis Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Nueces County, Sgt. Guitierez, Corporal Landa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUILLIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41829
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ANTHONY QUILLIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Curtis Cousins
as 21-1971
Defendant / Appellant:
Curtis Anthony Cousins
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
YOUNG v. PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICERS et al
as 2:2021cv00097
Defendant:
LT. SHICKATINO, FORD, PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICERS and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ANTHONY YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Crow
as 1:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Walter Myers and State Of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Curtis Anthony Clark
Respondent:
Warden John Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Myers et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00806
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Walter Myers and State of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Curtis Anthony Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
