Anderson v. The State et al
| Nadya Victorovna Anderson and The State |
| Criminal Court |
| 2:2023cv00904 |
| March 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Gordon Baker |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #8 Proper Form Order,blank civil complaint form,blank copy of our 26.01 interrogatories, two blank Forms USM-285, blank Form AO 240, two blank summonses, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Nadya Victorovna Anderson 37 Seminary Road Bedford, NY 10506-0108. (apsn) |
Filing 8
PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 4/25/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 04/04/2023. (apsn)
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Nadya Victorovna Anderson. (dgar) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Nadya Victorovna Anderson.(dgar) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Nadya Victorovna Anderson. Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Criminal Court, The State, filed by Nadya Victorovna Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dgar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
