Robinson et al v. North States Industries, Inc. et al
| Gregg Robinson and Kimberly Robinson |
| North States Industries, Inc. and Target Corporation |
| 2:2023cv03416 |
| July 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MEDIATION ORDER Mediation Due by 5/29/2024. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 09/01/2023. (hcor, ) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 01/30/2024, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 02/28/2024, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 03/28/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 04/04/2024, Discovery due by 04/29/2024, Motions in Limine must be filed within 5 days after the case is noticed for date certain for trial, Dispositive Motions and Daubert Motions due by 05/12/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 21 business days prior to jury selection, Pretrial Briefs due by 5 business days prior to the date set for jury selection, Case ready for jury selection and/or trial on or after 08/01/2024. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 09/01/2023. (hcor, ) |
| Filing 11 Joint Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Amended Conference and Scheduling Order)(Brown, Grace) |
| Filing 10 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 08/21/2023, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 09/05/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 09/05/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 10/30/2023, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 11/28/2023, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 12/28/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 01/04/2024, Discovery due by 01/29/2024, Motions in Limine must be filed within 5 days after the case is noticed for date certain for trial, Dispositive Motions and Daubert Motions due by 02/12/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 21 business days prior to jury selection, Pretrial Briefs due by 5 business days prior to the date set for jury selection, Case ready for jury selection and/or trial on or after 05/06/2024. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 07/31/2023. (hcor, ) |
| Filing 9 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Target Corporation.(Barrow, Mark) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Steven Barrow on behalf of Target Corporation (Barrow, Mark) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by North States Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Instructions)(Waring, Bradish) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Target Corporation.(Brown, Grace) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Charleston County County. (Attachments: #1 Acknowledgment of Receipt of Notice of Removal)(Waring, Bradish) |
| Filing 4 Plaintiffs' Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Gregg Robinson, Kimberly Robinson.(Andrews, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by North States Industries, Inc..(hcor, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023CP1002918. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11211114), filed by North States Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
