Smith v. Dorchester Water and Sewer Department et al
| Cynthia Louise Smith |
| Dorchester Water and Sewer Department, Dorchester County South Carolina, Principal Julie Fralix Byars, Todd Friddle, David Chinnis, Jason Ward, David T. Prentice, Bryan T. Havir, Tracey L. Langley, James Lex Byars, Edward Ivy Crosby, Jr., William R. Hearn, Jr., Larry S. Hagett, Harriet A. Holman and Rita May Ranck |
| 2:2023cv03572 |
| July 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Molly H Cherry |
| David C Norton |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Cynthia Louise Smith. Response to Motion due by 10/2/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motions referred to Molly H Cherry. (agaz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Lex Byars, Julie Fralix Byars, David Chinnis, Edward Ivy Crosby, Jr, Dorchester County South Carolina, Dorchester Water and Sewer Department, Todd Friddle, Larry S. Hagett, Bryan T. Havir, William R. Hearn, Jr, Harriet A. Holman, Tracey L. Langley, David T. Prentice, Rita May Ranck, Jason Ward ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 200019628.), filed by Cynthia Louise Smith. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Supporting Documents)(dgar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
