Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-2158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00789
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00206
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ward v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03315
Plaintiff:
Jason Ward
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Lee County et al
as 2:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Tammy King
Defendant:
LEE COUNTY, a Florida political subdivision, Sheriff Carmine Marceno, Deputy Sheriff Jay Brett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dorchester Water and Sewer Department et al
as 2:2023cv03572
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Louise Smith
Defendant:
Dorchester Water and Sewer Department, Dorchester County South Carolina, Principal Julie Fralix Byars and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Quincetta Cargill v. USA, et al
as 23-35185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINCETTA Y. CARGILL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSEPH R BIDEN, President of the United States of America, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States of America and others
WARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17923
Plaintiff:
JASON WARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
