Dingle v. Armstrong et al
| Eugene Dingle |
| Leslie Armstrong and Tim Mose |
| 2:2023cv04141 |
| August 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Molly H Cherry |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 5 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order, and the proper form documents (complaint for civil case form, summons form, Rule 26.01 form, two Forms USM-285, and Form AO-239) placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to Eugene Dingle 114 Port Chester Ln. Greenville, SC 29605. (agaz) Modified on 10/10/2023 to edit docket text (agaz). |
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER. Case to be brought into proper form by 10/31/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 10/10/2023. (agaz)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Eugene Dingle. Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(dgar) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Eugene Dingle. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(dgar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Leslie Armstrong, Tim Mose, filed by Eugene Dingle.(dgar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
