Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Dingle v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2023cv05841
Plaintiff:
Eugene C. Dingle
Defendant:
Leslie Armstrong and Tim Mose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Department of Social Services director Michael Leach et al
as 3:2023cv05696
Plaintiff:
Tori Keon Thompson
Defendant:
Department of Social Services director Michael Leach, Child Support Services director Tim Mose, Tony Cantone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dingle v. Sterling et al
as 2:2023cv05333
Plaintiff:
Eugene C Dingle
Defendant:
Candace Loreal Sterling, Tim Mose, Daniel Scoggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dingle v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2023cv04141
Plaintiff:
Eugene Dingle
Defendant:
Leslie Armstrong and Tim Mose
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Scott v. Mosely et al
as 1:2022cv21730
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Scott
Defendant:
Tim Mosely, Pharell Williams, Brian Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Theon Smith v. Michael Leach
as 21-1550
Defendant / Appellee:
TIM MOSE, a/k/a Tom Mose, Child Support Director, MICHAEL LEACH, DSS Director and JULIE J. ARMSTRONG
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEON SMITH
Smith v. Leach
as 21-1682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEON DONTRAY SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL LEACH, JULIE J ARMSTRONG and TIM MOSE
Theon Smith v. Michael Leach
as 21-1100
Defendant / Appellee:
TIM MOSE, a/k/a Tom Mose, Child Support Director, MICHAEL LEACH, DSS Director and JULIE J. ARMSTRONG
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEON SMITH
Smith v. Charleston County Domestic Relations et al
as 2:2020cv02853
Plaintiff:
Theon Dontray Smith
Defendant:
Michael Leach, Tim Mose, Charleston County Domestic Relations and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Joyner v. McMaster et al
as 6:2020cv01736
Defendant:
Michael Leach, Tim Mose, Kevin Shwedo and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy T Joyner, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
