Saunier v. Odom et al
| Kathy Saunier |
| Alexus Odom, Doordash, Inc., Assurant Insurance Agency, Inc., Voyager Indemnity Insurance Company and Global P&C Claims |
| 2:2024cv01229 |
| March 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Assurant Insurance Agency, Inc., Global P&C Claims, Voyager Indemnity Insurance Company.(Felix, Robert) |
| Filing 4 JOINT MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's complaint as to defendant Alexus Odom by Assurant Insurance Agency, Inc., Doordash, Inc., Voyager Indemnity Insurance Company. Response to Motion due by 3/27/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(hcor, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Doordash, Inc..(hcor, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023CP1001236. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ASCDC-11646260), filed by Assurant Insurance Agency, Inc., Voyager Indemnity Insurance Company, DoorDash, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Affidavit of Alexus Odom)(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
